Mike, what made you select this publication? It is a solid choice - always edifying, I think, and unexpected in its focus. And in regards to the history of film theory, an important publication.
What was its appeal to you?
I look forward to your posts, to your sense of what the publication is up to. Does it have an agenda, editorial stance?
Be sure to check out the D2L site for the guidelines for the next round of posts, due BY October 29. Get back to us with any questions.
1 comment:
Mike, what made you select this publication? It is a solid choice - always edifying, I think, and unexpected in its focus. And in regards to the history of film theory, an important publication.
What was its appeal to you?
I look forward to your posts, to your sense of what the publication is up to. Does it have an agenda, editorial stance?
Be sure to check out the D2L site for the guidelines for the next round of posts, due BY October 29. Get back to us with any questions.
Post a Comment